Return
to 2003 Gallery Walk list
2003 Gallery Walk Projects Title:
eTIP Cases Organization:
University
of Minnesota ( in partnership with the Vermont Institutes, the IMMEX
Software Development Lab, and Vanderbilt University)
Web
site:
http://www.etips.info
|
Contact: |
Sara
Dexter – sdexter@umn.edu
|
||||||||||
What
purpose does your assessment tool serve? |
The
eTIP Cases are multimedia, online instructional resources that provide
learning opportunities with embedded assessment for teachers to
practice their instructional decision-making skills, particularly
related to technology integration and implementation. These cases
provide learners with virtual yet realistic context-rich experiences
to grapple with as they apply an Educational Technology Integration
and Implementation Principle, or eTIP. While learners seek out the
different school context information in each case to answer the key
question that was posed in the case’s opening scenario, the
embedded, web-based assessment tools track their work. Students’
step-by-step decisions are displayed in the form of search-path maps
powered by IMMEXTM, and as relevancy scores. Students’
essay responses to the question are submitted and scored online as
well |
||||||||||
Please
indicate which category best describes your tool: |
a.
_____ Tools that allow users to ask questions of data (tools
for collecting and disaggregating data, including surveys,
self-reported data and standardized data) b.
____ Tools for observation (including teacher observation and
observation of student behavior or performance) c.
_X__ Tools for reviewing student products (including electronic
or digital portfolios) This
category best fits, although it isn’t very exact. The student
product assessed here is the learner’s instructional decision making
about technology integration. The case is an exercise to elicit that
and the case software captures as a student product both the decision
the learner submits and the “thinking trail” through the case and
en route to this decision. |
||||||||||
Who
is the audience for this assessment tool? |
There
are two audiences: a) University instructors and the preservice or
in-service teachers who are their students and b) Staff developers at
schools and the in-service teachers who are their students. |
||||||||||
What
technology is used? |
|
||||||||||
Approximately
how many people are currently using this system? |
|
||||||||||
What
professional development (for students or assessors) is required to
use the tool? |
Teacher
educators should review our online implementation support materials. These
help teacher educators understand a) the issues the eTIPs cover, the
implications they hold for preservice teachers, and their
relationships to the technology standards; b)
how the design of the problem space and set design facilitates
analysis and decision-making practice by preservice teachers about
technology integration and implementation issues; c)
the suite of assessment tools that are available to use with the eTIP
Cases; and d)
support teacher educators developing instructional plans for teachers
to use and learn from the eTIP Cases. Learners can use the cases if
they have the prerequisite skills of navigating with a web browser and
utilizing and word processor and cut and paste commands. |
||||||||||
To
use the tool effectively, what else should the school have in place? |
To
use eTIP Cases effectively, the site should have in place some
familiarity with using simulations or cases as a teaching and learning
method. This will help instructors/facilitators and learners to
recognize how
the case, or simulated school experience, provides an opportunity to
reason and think about technology integration or implementation as
well as a platform for providing a group with a common experience in
thinking about technology, so as to facilitate group discussion in a
class or staff. |
||||||||||
If
you haven't already addressed it, how does your tool help students or
teachers demonstrate that they are meeting standards? |
The
eTIP Cases help preservice or in-service teachers demonstrate that
they are meeting standards through the assessment tools inherent in
the cases. There are scored essays, and visual representations of the
"search paths" students used to reason their way to the
scored essays. |
||||||||||
What
questions would you like participants to address? |
|