Return
to 2003 Gallery Walk list
2003 Gallery Walk Projects Title:
The Johns Hopkins Electronic Portfolio Organization:
Johns Hopkins University Center for Technology in Education Web site: http://cte.jhu.edu/epweb (See
also Teacher Compass below |
Contact: |
Gigi
Devanney – devanney@jhu.edu
|
||||||||||
What
purpose does your assessment tool serve? |
The
JHU Electronic Portfolio is a standards-based system that builds on
and extends the traditional paper portfolio. The EP allows students to
demonstrate attainment of competency in relation to established
educational standards, provides an online journal for reflection, and
includes a powerful embedded messaging system that promotes and
encourages on-going collaboration with peers and advisors. The
EP was designed to accomplish the following objectives:
§
Promote and support a focus on the development of quality
content by providing users with an easy-to-use, template-driven,
online tool for creating, storing and accessing their portfolios
anytime, anywhere. §
Encourage and facilitate ongoing collaboration by furnishing
users with an easy, safe and secure method for sharing their work with
peers, advisors, a portfolio review team and prospective employers. §
Reinforce and encourage reflective teaching practice by
incorporating a journal tool and the ability to convert journal
entries into portfolio artifacts to demonstrate growth over time. §
Enhance and enrich the portfolio process by inspiring
students/users to create a final presentation portfolio that serves as
both a showcase of their work for prospective employers as well as a
vehicle for continued professional development and reflection. |
||||||||||
Please
indicate which category best describes your tool: |
a.
_____ Tools that allow users to ask questions of data (tools
for collecting and disaggregating data, including surveys,
self-reported data and standardized data) b.
____ Tools for observation (including teacher observation and
observation of student behavior or performance) c.
_X__ Tools for reviewing student products (including electronic
or digital portfolios) |
||||||||||
Who
is the audience for this assessment tool? |
The
JHU EP is an electronic portfolio designed to be used by pre-service
and in-service educators. At successful portfolio review is required
for program completion at JHU. The EP takes the place of the
traditional masters thesis. Pre-service
and in-service educators, institutions of higher education, and school
administrators. |
||||||||||
What
technology is used? |
The
EP is web-based may be accessed from any computer with access to the
Internet – a 56k modem is suitable.
So far, all of our portfolio communities have been hosted here
at JHU. But we are willing to explore licensing the code to run on a
school or organization's local server in one of two formats
--one in which the code is encrypted (and thus not modify-able)
or un-encrypted (able to be customized and integrated into existing
systems). |
||||||||||
Approximately
how many people are currently using this system? |
|
||||||||||
What
professional development (for students or assessors) is required to
use the tool? |
Very
little. The JHU EP accommodates novice to expert technology
users.Although the JHU Center for Technology in Education fully
supports the EP and offers a variety of wrap-around services designed
to ensure successful implementation, the program is an
easy-to-use web-based tool. Consulting
services are available on both the application and the portfolio
process and can include interviews, surveys and focus groups to
establish a clear plan for implementation and sustainability. CTE then
employs a train-the-trainer model using both face-to-face and online
tutorials to instruct stakeholders in the effective use of the EP
tools and functions. |
||||||||||
To
use the tool effectively, what else should the school have in place? |
We
have worked with organizations that are familiar with the portfolio
process as well as those that are new to the world of portfolio
assessment. Obviously, faculty and students need access the internet
and basic computer skills. The JHU EP is web-based and although
several hosting models are available, most institutions prefer to have
JHU host the application. A
recent addition to the JHU EP is the Reviewer interface that allows
the review team full access to the competed portfolio, provides tools
for reviewer note-taking and offers the ability to record preliminary
scores based on a four-point rubric. |
||||||||||
If
you haven't already addressed it, how does your tool help students or
teachers demonstrate that they are meeting standards? |
The
JHU EP is customizable in a number of ways allowing, for instance, a
program to determine the standard sets that will provide the primary
organizational structure for the student portfolios. In addition,
students can easily input their own sets of local, state, or
national standards that may be relevant to their area of study.
The EP provides a structure that
promotes clear demonstration of professional capabilities and
achievements and it encourages a goal-oriented approach to education
and provides and easy method for tracking progress. |
||||||||||
What
questions would you like participants to address? |
What
is your overall impression of the tool? |
Organization:
Johns Hopkins University Center for Technology in Education
Web
site:
http://teachercompass.com
Contact: |
Lynne
Mainzer
– mainzer@jhu.edu Gigi
Devanney – devanney@jhu.edu
|
||||||||||
What
purpose does your assessment tool serve? |
It is not uncommon for principals and supervisors to be faced
with more than hundred teacher observations in a year.
Teacher Compass is a Web-based application that provides
a practical, efficient, and time-saving way for principals and school
administrators to gather, input, and analyze teacher performance data.
Teacher Compass helps to save principals valuable time
by providing a portable, standardized, template-driven system for
collecting teacher observation data that can be customized to a school
district’s evaluation procedures. |
||||||||||
Please
indicate which category best describes your tool: |
a.
_____ Tools that allow users to ask questions of data (tools
for collecting and disaggregating data, including surveys,
self-reported data and standardized data) b.
__X__ Tools for observation (including teacher observation and
observation of student behavior or performance) c.
___ Tools for reviewing student products (including electronic
or digital portfolios) |
||||||||||
Who
is the audience for this assessment tool? |
Principals
and school administrators |
||||||||||
What
technology is used? |
Web-application
for Windows /or Mac. |
||||||||||
Approximately
how many people are currently using this system? |
|