Return
to 2003 Gallery Walk list
2003 Gallery Walk Projects Title:
Principal,
Superintendent and School Counseling Electronic Certification
Portfolio System (Foliotek.com) Organization:
University
of Missouri-Columbia and LANIT Consulting Web
site:
http://portfolio.coe.missouri.edu
AND www.foliotek.com
|
Contact: |
Kellye
Crockett – crockettk@missouri.edu
|
||||||||||
What
purpose does your assessment tool serve? |
|
||||||||||
Please
indicate which category best describes your tool: |
a.
_____ Tools that allow users to ask questions of data (tools
for collecting and disaggregating data, including surveys,
self-reported data and standardized data) b.
____ Tools for observation (including teacher observation and
observation of student behavior or performance) c.
_X__ Tools for reviewing student products (including electronic
or digital portfolios) |
||||||||||
Who
is the audience for this assessment tool? |
|
||||||||||
What
technology is used? |
The
portfolio system (Foliotek) is a Web site hosted in a secure data
center. Users simply connect to the system via the Internet.
Users need only a Web browser to connect to the portfolio
system and begin using it. The
portfolio system is built on the following components:
|
||||||||||
Approximately
how many people are currently using this system? |
|
||||||||||
What
professional development (for students or assessors) is required to
use the tool? |
The
"students" in our system are often practicing education
professionals. They are
often enrolled in their degree programs part time and/or online.
Therefore our system needed to have a very easy to use
structure. Students
receive very little training prior to using the system (1-2 hours
total). The layout of the
navigation is built to reflect the structure of the initial teacher
certification portfolio system, which many of these students have
completed. Faculty
attend one initial training session when they begin using the
electronic portfolio system (one hour).
Faculty responsibilities in the electronic portfolio system are
focused on providing formative and summative evaluative feedback to
students as they produce and revise their portfolios.
The electronic portfolio system provides vehicles for formative
comments, summative evaluation records, and coordinated peer reviews.
All of these functions are covered in the 1-hour training session. |
||||||||||
To
use the tool effectively, what else should the school have in place? |
The
University of Missouri-Columbia principal, superintendent and school
counseling portfolios are standards based.
School leader portfolios are organized around the Interstate
School Leadership Licensure Consortium (ISLLC) Standards.
School Counselor portfolios are organized around the Missouri
Quality Indicators for School Counselors.
These standards are infused throughout the program, so students
are already familiar with them prior to beginning work on their
portfolio. Each set of
standards has an accompanying scoring rubric upon which the portfolio
is evaluated. The
portfolio system uses a web-based interface that is equivalent in
skill level to web based email or online shopping.
For those students interested in increasing their technology
skills, the portfolio system can accommodate, images audio files and
video files, in addition to text and graphic files. The
portfolio system follows a "common tools" approach that
allows students to utilize their knowledge of common applications and
formats such as MS Word, Excel, PowerPoint, Adobe Acrobat, and HTML.
Allowing users to keep their artifacts in these common formats
means they can begin immediately adding artifacts they have already
created, they don’t have to learn a special tool or format to create
their artifacts, and their artifacts are in a common format that can
be used in other contexts outside of the portfolio system.
|
||||||||||
If
you haven't already addressed it, how does your tool help students or
teachers demonstrate that they are meeting standards? |
The
portfolio system provides multiple levels of assessment beginning with
the individual student and going all the way to programmatic
assessment. There
is a standards view on the portfolio that allows the student and
teacher to see how different items in the portfolio are associated
with different standards. At
a glance they can do a standards gap analysis to see which standards
they are addressing well and which standards may need more attention.
Additionally,
scoring guides are set up that allow teachers to evaluate a student
based on the standards in the portfolio.
This information will allow the teacher to provide formal
feedback to the student on how they are meeting the standard.
Completed evaluations can be published to for the student to
view, allowing the student to see where they may be excelling or where
they may need to focus their attention.
The student is then able to revise any artifacts in their
portfolio and resubmit it for evaluation.
This formative process of assessment/feedback and revision
continue as long as deemed necessary by the program or teacher. Although
not directly addressed in the questions, it is also worth noting that
the portfolio system allows us to extract programmatic data related to
the successful implementation of standards within the College.
Viewing cross sections of this data helps us to understand how
different areas of the College are successfully infusing the knowledge
and skill of the standards within the curriculum. |
||||||||||
What
questions would you like participants to address? |
|